Οι Εβραίοι κυβερνούν κρυφά το Ιράν για πάνω από 1.000 χρόνια! – Οι οικογένειες Χομεϊνί και Χαμενεΐ είναι ΚΡΥΠΤΟ-ΕΒΡΑΪΚΕΣ και κατάγονται από την…ΕΛΛΗΝΟΒΥΖΑΝΤΙΝΗ ΒΑΣΙΛΙΚΗ ΟΙΚΟΓΕΝΕΙΑ των Κομνηνών!!!
-του Γιάννη Κουντούρη | Λος Άντζελες | 18 Ιουνίου 2026 |Βρείτε με στα μέσα κοινωνικής δικτύωσης!: Facebook • Twitter • Instagram • LinkedIn • Youtube
ΣΟΥΠΕΡ ΣΟΚ εξ Ιράν: Τα σόγια Χομεϊνί και Χαμενεΐ κατάγονται εκ των…Κομνηνών του Βυζαντίου και είναι…ΚΡΥΠΤΟ-ΕΒΡΑΪΚΑ!!! Οι οικογένειες Χομεϊνί και Χαμενεΐ είναι το εν και το αυτό.
Δείτε πρώτα τα παρακάτω βίντεο…
Διαβάστε τώρα το εξής άρθρο για όλες τις λεπτομέρειες…
Έντουαρντ Μενέζ: Οι Εβραίοι ελέγχουν το Ιράν για πάνω από 1000 χρόνια
26 Οκτωβρίου 2023
(Πρίγκιπας Διάδοχος Μοχάμεντ Ρεζά Παχλεβί)
Οι Ελευθεροτέκτονες έχουν βρεθεί και στις δύο πλευρές σε κάθε παγκόσμιο πόλεμο. Ο επόμενος δεν θα είναι διαφορετικός.
Χρησιμοποιούν πολέμους για να εξοντώσουν το ανθρώπινο κοπάδι και να βγάλουν χρήματα. Η κόλαση στη Γη είναι το όνειρο των Σατανιστών.
-του Edward Menez
(henrymakow.com)
Θα υποθέσω ότι ο αναγνώστης γνωρίζει ότι οι Εβραίοι ξεκίνησαν τον Τεκτονισμό. Ναι, κάθε πτυχή του Τεκτονισμού είναι εβραϊκή. Ο Τεκτονισμός ξεκίνησε ως ένας τρόπος για να κάνουν τους Γκογίμ να συμπορευτούν με τους σατανικούς, Ταλμουδικούς Εβραίους.
Αυτό το άρθρο από την ιστοσελίδα του Miles Mathis (3 Ιουνίου 2019) από τον “Donny Ahzmond” (σύνδεσμος: http://mileswmathis.com/iran.pdf) ανιχνεύει την ιστορία του Ιράν τα τελευταία 1000 χρόνια μέχρι τον 11ο αιώνα, όπου είχε την καταγωγή της η διάσημη οικογένεια Κομνηνών.
“Ένα από τα πρώτα γνωστά μέλη της οικογένειας ήταν ο Νικηφόρος Κομνηνός, ο οποίος ήταν κυβερνήτης του Βασπουρακάν τον 11ο αιώνα. Το Βασπουρακάν περιλαμβάνει τη σύγχρονη νοτιοανατολική Τουρκία και το βορειοδυτικό Ιράν, όπου βρίσκεται ο Χαμενεΐ. Τουλάχιστον, έχουμε διαπιστώσει ότι ο Ανώτατος Ηγέτης Χαμενεΐ φέρει το όνομα μιας πόλης που κατά πάσα πιθανότητα πήρε το όνομά της από την αρχαία οικογένεια Κομνηνών, η οποία επίσης κατάγεται από αυτήν την περιοχή.”
ΚΟΜΝΗΝΟΙ = ΚΟΜΕΝ = ΚΟΕΝ (Αγγλικά: KOMNENE (or Komnenoi) = KOMEN = KOHEN)
Ο Miles Mathis έχει προτείνει ότι το όνομα Κοέν θα μπορούσε να είναι μια παραλλαγή του Κομνηνός, μέσω του Κομέν, και ο συγγραφέας Donny Ahzmond το αναφέρει αυτό στο άρθρο του. Αλλά ο Ahzmond κάνει πολύ περισσότερη γενεαλογική έρευνα στο άρθρο του του 2019: συνδέει τους Εβραίους ως ηγεμόνες της «δυναστείας των Σαφαβιδών, η οποία διήρκεσε από το 1501 έως το 1722 και περιλάμβανε αυτό που είναι τώρα το Ιράν, η Αρμενία, το Αζερμπαϊτζάν και μέρη του Βόρειου Καυκάσου, η Τουρκία, το Ιράκ, το Αφγανιστάν και η Συρία, και πέρα από αυτό». Βασικά, η δυναστεία των Σαφαβιδών ήταν συνέχεια της δυναστείας των Κομνηνών και ακολουθήθηκε από τη δυναστεία των Ζαντ. Η ομοιότητα και η συνέχεια μεταξύ και των τριών δυναστειών: Ο Ahzmond δείχνει με γενεαλογία στο άρθρο του ότι όλες διοικούνταν από Εβραίους.
Τον 20ό αιώνα, η κρυπτοεβραϊκή βασιλεία του Ιράν συνεχίστηκε με τη δυναστεία των Παχλεβί. Πρώτος ήρθε ο Ρεζά Παχλεβί το 1921, ακολουθούμενος από τον γιο του Μοχάμεντ Ρεζά Παχλεβί, ο οποίος κυβέρνησε μέχρι την ανατροπή του από τον Αγιατολάχ Χομεϊνί στην Ιρανική Επανάσταση του 1979. Ο Μοχάμεντ Ρεζά Παχλεβί κυβέρνησε το Ιράν από το 1941 έως το 1979, μαζί με τον ομοφυλόφιλο Εβραίο εραστή του Έρνεστ Περόν, όπως αναφέρεται στο άρθρο του Ahzmond.
ΚΑΝΟΥΜΕ ΤΟΝ ΠΛΗΡΗ ΚΥΚΛΟ ΜΑΣ ΑΠΟ ΤΟΥΣ ΚΟΜΝΗΝΟΥΣ ΣΤΟΥΣ ΧΟΜΕΪΝΙ (και ΤΟΥΣ ΧΑΜΕΝΕΪ)
Μας λένε ότι ο Σαγίντ Ρουχολάχ Μουσαβί Χομεϊνί έγινε ο Ανώτατος Ηγέτης του Ιράν το 1979. Αλλά σημειώστε το προτελευταίο του όνομα Μουσαβί. Ο Ahzmnd εξηγεί: «Όταν αναζητάτε το επώνυμο Μουσαβί, η Wikipedia σας μεταφέρει σε αυτήν τη σελίδα, με μια λίστα αξιοσημείωτων προσώπων που έχουν αυτό το επώνυμο, συμπεριλαμβανομένου του Χομεϊνί. Αλλά δεν σας λέει τίποτα για το ίδιο το όνομα, όπως την προέλευση ή τη σημασία του. Παραδόξως, η ενότητα «Δείτε επίσης» στο κάτω μέρος, σας συνδέει με αυτήν τη σελίδα για το επώνυμο Αλ-Μουσαβί. Είναι περίεργο γιατί είναι προφανές ότι πρόκειται για το ίδιο επώνυμο με τον Μουσαβί, απαριθμώντας πολλά από τα ίδια άτομα με τη σελίδα του Μουσαβί».
Η Wikipedia αναφέρει τον Χομεϊνί ως μέλος αυτής της οικογένειας και στη συνέχεια ισχυρίζεται, ξεκάθαρα:
…«καταγόταν από τη δυναστεία των Σαφαβιδών».
Η σελίδα της Wikipedia αναφέρει επίσης τον Αμπάς αλ-Μουσαβί, ιδρυτή της ΧΕΖΜΠΟΛΛΑ, ως μέλος της οικογένειας…!!!
ΠΑΜΕ ΣΤΟΝ ΜΑΧΜΟΥΝΤ ΑΧΜΑΝΤΙΝΕΖΑΝΤ
Και όσον αφορά τον νεοσύστατο 21ο αιώνα, ο πιο διάσημος και παραγωγικός ηγέτης του Ιράν ήταν ο Μαχμούντ Αχμαντινετζάντ. Θα μπορούσε να είναι και Εβραίος; Η Telegraph, μια εφημερίδα με μεγάλη κυκλοφορία, φαίνεται να το πιστεύει αυτό:
«Μια φωτογραφία του Ιρανού προέδρου να κρατά ψηλά την ταυτότητά του κατά τη διάρκεια των εκλογών του Μαρτίου 2008 δείχνει ξεκάθαρα ότι η οικογένειά του έχει εβραϊκές ρίζες.
Ένα κοντινό πλάνο του εγγράφου αποκαλύπτει ότι προηγουμένως ήταν γνωστός ως Sabourjian – ένα εβραϊκό όνομα που σημαίνει υφαντής υφασμάτων.
Το σύντομο σημείωμα που είναι γραμμένο στην κάρτα υποδηλώνει ότι η οικογένειά του άλλαξε το όνομά της σε Ahmadinejad όταν ασπάστηκαν το Ισλάμ μετά τη γέννησή του.
Οι Sabourjian παραδοσιακά κατάγονται από το Aradan, τη γενέτειρα του κ. Ahmadinejad, και το όνομα προέρχεται από το «υφαντής του Sabour», το όνομα για το εβραϊκό σάλι Tallit στην Περσία. Το όνομα βρίσκεται ακόμη και στη λίστα με τα δεσμευμένα ονόματα για τους Ιρανούς Εβραίους που έχει καταρτίσει το Υπουργείο Εσωτερικών του Ιράν».
Η ΕΛΕΓΧΟΜΕΝΗ ΑΝΤΙΣΤΑΣΗ ΤΩΝ ΕΒΡΑΙΩΝ
Το άρθρο του Donny Ahzmond μας λέει όλα τα παραπάνω για τη συνεχή 1000χρονη εβραϊκή βασιλεία του Ιράν. Υποστηρίζει μάλιστα ότι οι εβραϊκές ρίζες των Σαφαβιδών και των Κομνηνών ανάγονται στο 309 μ.Χ. στο σύγχρονο Ιράν, το οποίο κάποτε ήταν μέρος της Περσικής Αυτοκρατορίας.
Σε μια ενημέρωση του άρθρου που δημοσιεύτηκε 10 ημέρες αργότερα, στις 13 Ιουνίου 2019, μαθαίνουμε ότι ο Διευθύνων Σύμβουλος της Uber, Dara Khosrowshahi, είναι Παχλεβί και ότι η σύζυγος του Dara είναι η Sydney SHAPIRO. Ο αδελφός του Dara είναι ο Kaveh Khosrowshahi. «Μια αναζήτηση στο whitepages.com διαπιστώνει ότι ο Kaveh έχει συγγένεια με την Kathleen Grant Khosrowshahi του Σιάτλ, καθώς και με τον James Dover Grant», γνωστό και με το ψευδώνυμό του, Lee Child, τον συγγραφέα της σειράς μυθιστορημάτων Jack Reacher. Είναι μια μικρή, διασυνδεδεμένη λέσχη, έτσι δεν είναι;
Μια παράλληλη έρευνα σχετικά με τους Εβραίους που διοικούν χώρες πλούσιες σε πετρέλαιο, υποτίθεται ότι μουσουλμανικές, όπως το Ιράν, θα σας οδηγούσε αναπόφευκτα σε πληροφορίες για το Βασίλειο των Σαούντ, όπου βρίσκουμε κύρια άρθρα όπως https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-692595, https://kayhan.ir/en/news/51411/mbs-admits-the-jewish-roots-of-the-saudi-clan, και https://pdf.defence.pk/threads/the-origin-and-historical-background-of-saudi-royal-family.375044/.
ΣΥΜΠΕΡΑΣΜΑ
Μπορούν λοιπόν το Ιράν και η Σαουδική Αραβία να είναι πράγματι αντιπολίτευση ελεγχόμενη από τους Εβραίους; Φαίνεται ναι. Φαίνεται ότι το Ιράν και η Σαουδική Αραβία ήταν πάντα ελεγχόμενη αντιπολίτευση, πιθανώς για να υποκινήσουν συγκρούσεις και αναταραχές στη Μέση Ανατολή, κάτι που στη συνέχεια ανεβάζει τις τιμές του πετρελαίου. Ποιος πιστεύετε ότι ελέγχει όλες τις πετρελαϊκές εταιρείες τώρα; Οι Εβραίοι ή οι μη Εβραίοι;
Τέλος, μάθαμε παραπάνω ότι οι Εβραίοι δημιούργησαν τη Χεζμπολάχ. Ο Αμερικανός γερουσιαστής Ρον Πολ είπε κάποτε ότι η Χαμάς δημιουργήθηκε από το Ισραήλ ως ανάχωμα απέναντι στον Σαντάμ Χουσεΐν. Υπάρχει κάτι που δεν ελέγχεται και δεν διοικείται πλέον από τους Εβραίους; Οι Εβραίοι έχουν ουσιαστικά παραδεχτεί ότι οτιδήποτε συμβαίνει -το οποίο καλύπτεται από τα κυρίαρχα μέσα ενημέρωσης, φυσικά- δεν είναι τυχαίο: δημιουργείται από αυτούς.
Πόσο εύκολο θα ήταν λοιπόν για τους Ισραηλινούς να υποδυθούν τη Χαμάς στις 7 Οκτωβρίου, να «συλλάβουν» αρκετές εκατοντάδες Ισραηλινούς και να πλαστογραφήσουν τις σκηνές των επιθέσεων της Χαμάς με ψεύτικο αίμα και μανεκέν; Το Ισραήλ παραδέχεται απρόθυμα τώρα ότι χαλάρωσε την επαγρύπνησή του για 7 ώρες για να επιτρέψει στη Χαμάς να εισέλθει στο Ισραήλ και να σκοτώσει εκατοντάδες Ισραηλινούς. Όχι, δεν το πιστεύω αυτό ούτε για μια στιγμή. Δεν νομίζω ότι σκοτώθηκε κανένας Ισραηλινός στις 7 Οκτωβρίου. Γνωρίζουμε πολύ καλά ποιος διευθύνει αυτές τις ψευδείς επιθέσεις και τα γεγονότα που μοιάζουν με «Περλ Χάρμπορ», όπως η 11η Σεπτεμβρίου και η «σφαγή» της 7ης Οκτωβρίου.
Τώρα, για να διαβάσετε περισσόρα επι του θέματος που συνδέει την βασιλική, βαζτνατινή οικογένεια των Κομνηνών με τους Εβραίους των οίκων Χομεϊνί και Χαμενεϊ , διαβάστε εδώ στο άρθρο με τίτλο “Iran’s Jewish Rulers”. Είναι ΜΟΝΟ στα αγγλικά αλλά περιέχει στοιχεία ΑΔΙΑΣΕΙΣΤΑ επί του θέματους αυτου!!! >> https://mileswmathis.com/iran.pdf
ΠΗΓΗ: https://www.henrymakow.com/2023/10/edward-menez—jews-have-contr.html
Jews have secretly ruled Iran for over 1,000 years! – The Khomeini and Khamenei families are CRYPRO-JEWISH and descend from the…GREEK BYZANTINE ROYAL FAMILY Komnenos!!!
-by John Kountouris | Los Angeles | April 26, 2026 |Find me on social Media!: Facebook • Twitter • Instagram • LinkedIn • Youtube
Watch first the following videos…
Read now the following article for more…
Edward Menez – Jews Have Controlled Iran for Over 1000 Years
October 26, 2023
(left, Crown Prince Mohammed Reza Pahlevi)
Freemasons have been on both sides of every world war. The next one will be no different.
They use wars to cull the human herd and make money. Hell on Earth is the Satanist’s dream.
Partisans on both sides are committing suicide.
Disclaimer – I don’t agree with Menez’s contention that Israel casualties were faked. Zionists have no compunction about killing Jews. They killed millions in the holocaust.
by Edward Menez
(henrymakow.com)
Building on Henry’s article from October 4, 2010, “Iran Also Controlled by Satanists” and re-published October 25, 2023, “Israel and Iran are Both Run By Freemasons Plotting WW3,” I will make the assumption that the reader knows that Jews started Freemasonry. Yes, every aspect of Freemasonry is Jewish. Freemasonry was started as a way to make the goyim fall in lockstep with the satanic, Talmudic Jews.
This article from Miles Mathis’ website (June 3, 2019) by “Donny Ahzmond” http://mileswmathis.com/iran.pdf. traces the history of Iran for the past 1000 years to the 11th century, where the famous Komnene family had its origins.
“One of the first known family members was Nikephoros Komnenos, who was governor of Vaspurakan in the 11th century. Vaspurakan comprises modern-day southeast Turkey and northwest Iran, where Khamenei is located. At the very least, we’ve established that Supreme Leader Khamenei bears the name of a town that was in all likelihood named after the ancient Komnene family who also originated in that region.”
KOMNENE=KOMEN=KOHEN
Miles Mathis has suggested that the name Cohen or Kohen could be a variant of Komnene, by way of Komen, and the author Donny Ahzmond mentions that in his article. But Ahzmond does much more genealogy in his 2019 article: he links Jews as rulers of “the Safavid dynasty, which lasted from 1501 to 1722 and encompassed what is now Iran, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and parts of the North Caucasus, Turkey, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria, and beyond.” Basically, the Safavid dynasty was a continuation of the Komnene dynasty and was followed by the Zand dynasty. The commonality and continuity between all three dynasties: Ahzmond shows with genealogy in his article that they were all run by Jews.
In the 20th century, the crypto-Jewish reign of Iran continued with the Pahlavi dynasty. First came Reza Pahlavi in 1921, followed by his son Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who ruled until he was overthrown by Ayatollah Khomeini in the Iranian Revolution of 1979. Mohammad Reza Pahlavi ruled Iran from 1941 until 1979, alongside his gay Jewish lover Ernest Perron, as mentioned in Ahzmond’s article.
FULL CIRCLE FROM KOMNENE TO KHOMEINI
We’re told that Sayyid Ruhollah Mousavi Khomeini became the Supreme Leader of Iran in 1979. But note his second-to-last name Mousavi. Ahzmnd explains: “When you search the surname Mousavi, Wikipedia takes you to this page, with a list of notable people who have that surname, including Khomeini. But it doesn’t tell you anything about the name itself, such as its origin or meaning. Strangely, the “See Also” section at the bottom, it links you to this page for the surname Al-Musawi. It’s strange because it’s evident this is the same surname as Mousavi, listing many of the same people as the Mousavi page.”
Wikipedia lists Khomeini as a member of this family and then asserts, plain as day:
…”he descended from the Safavid dynasty.”
The Wikipedia page also lists Abbas al-Musawi, founder of HEZBOLLAH, as a family member.
ON TO MAHMOUD AHMADINEJAD
And as for the nascent 21st century, Iran’s most famous and prolific leader has been Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Could he be Jewish as well? The Telegraph, a mainstream newspaper, seems to think so:
“A photograph of the Iranian president holding up his identity card during elections in March 2008 clearly shows his family has Jewish roots.
A close-up of the document reveals he was previously known as Sabourjian – a Jewish name meaning cloth weaver.
The short note scrawled on the card suggests his family changed its name to Ahmadinejad when they converted to embrace Islam after his birth.
The Sabourjians traditionally hail from Aradan, Mr. Ahmadinejad’s birthplace, and the name derive from “weaver of the Sabour”, the name for the Jewish Tallit shawl in Persia. The name is even on the list of reserved names for Iranian Jews compiled by Iran’s Ministry of the Interior.”
JEWISH CONTROLLED OPPOSITION
Donny Ahzmond’s article tells us all of the above about the continuous 1000-year Jewish reign of Iran. It even posits that the Jewish roots of the Safavids and Komnenes go back to 309 A.D. in modern-day Iran, which was once part of the Persian Empire.
In an update to the article posted 10 days later on June 13, 2019, we learn that Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi is a Pahlavi and that Dara’s wife is Sydney SHAPIRO. Dara’s brother is Kaveh Khosrowshahi. “A whitepages.com search finds that Kaveh is related to Kathleen Grant Khosrowshahi of Seattle, as well as James Dover Grant,” otherwise known by his pen name, Lee Child, the author of the Jack Reacher series of novels. It’s a small, interconnected club, innit? And you ain’t in it.
A parallel investigation on Jews running oil-rich, supposedly Muslim countries like Iran, would inevitably take you to information on the Kingdom of Saud, where we get mainstream articles like https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-692595, https://kayhan.ir/en/news/51411/mbs-admits-the-jewish-roots-of-the-saudi-clan, and https://pdf.defence.pk/threads/the-origin-and-historical-background-of-saudi-royal-family.375044/.
CONCLUSION
So could Iran and Saudi Arabia really be Jewish-controlled, controlled opposition? It seems so. It appears that Iran and Saudi Arabia have always been controlled opposition, probably to foment conflict and unrest in the Middle East, which subsequently raises oil prices. Who do you think controls all of the oil companies now? Jews, or non-Jews?
Finally, we learned above that the Jews created Hezbollah. Ron Paul says that Hamas was created by Israel as a buffer to Saddam Hussein. Is there anything not controlled and run by the Jews anymore? The Jews have basically admitted that anything that happens–which is covered by mainstream media, of course–is not an accident: it is created by them.
So how easy would it have been for Israelis to have impersonated Hamas on October 7, “captured” several hundred Israelis, and faked the crime scenes of Hamas attacks with fake blood and mannequins? Israel is grudgingly admitting now that they let their guard down for 7 hours to allow Hamas into Israel to kill hundreds of Israelis. Naw, I don’t believe that for a minute. I don’t think any Israelis were killed on October 7. We know perfectly well who is running these false flags and “Pearl Harbor”-like events such as 9/11 and the October 7 “massacre.”
SOURCE: https://www.henrymakow.com/2023/10/edward-menez—jews-have-contr.html
Iran’s Jewish Rulers
by Donny Ahzmond
June 3, 2019
It appears a couple of Saudi oil tankers were attacked off the coast of the United Arab Emirates a
couple weeks ago, and the US is blaming Iran. Obviously, this is just a false flag being used to
keep everyone tense, or justify the defense budget, or play with oil prices, or all the above. But it
got me thinking about Iran and its rulers – who they are and where they came from. So let’s take
a turn through the mainstream bios with our eyes open, and see what we see. As it turns out,
they’re all Jewish. They are not “Arab” or “Persian” or “Middle Eastern”. These are all just
broad ethnic terms that signify nothing. They are used merely to keep you off the scent. And
none of Iran’s leaders are Muslim, either. Most of Islam’s top clerics and religious leaders have
been placed there to control the religion and keep its adherents focused on the wrong things.
They are doing the same thing with Christianity in the West. See the Pope, Billy Graham, the
faith dealers, etc. So this paper is just more evidence that Islamic extremism isn’t a real thing,
nor has Iran ever been a nuclear threat.
The current Supreme Leader of Iran is Ali Khamenei. Since the Iranian Revolution of 1979
which overthrew the last imperial Shah, there have been two Supreme Leaders: Ruhollah
Khomeini (1979 – 1989) and Ali Khamenei (1989 – present). We pronounce their names the
same in English, and having heard the names frequently throughout my life, I had always
assumed these Iranian leaders were related. When I ask Google if they’re related, I’m told the
names sound very different in the Persian language, and they are both place names referring to
two distant towns where the two Supreme Leaders trace their family roots. Let’s unwind that.
Khamenei means “from Khamaneh”, a town in the Azerbaijan province of Iran, in the northwest.
If you haven’t looked at a map of the Middle East recently, this is the area of Iran that borders
Armenia. Khamaneh is only 80 miles south of the Armenian border. Why is that important?
Because the crypto-Jewish Komnene family that infiltrated all the European thrones are from
Armenia. See Miles’ paper on the Crusades if you don’t know what I am talking about. In fact,
the Komnene’s Byzantine empire at one point encompassed present-day northwest Iran where
Khamaneh is located. That’s fairly strong evidence that the town itself was named in tribute to its
rulers, the Komnenes. The town can also be spelled Khāmneh or Khumna. Is it possible that the
Supreme Leader Khamenei is actually a Komnene? This would mean the mainstream story is
reversing the truth about his name. His family isn’t named for the town; the town is named for
his family.
My hunch gets more validation when we examine the Komnene’s origins. One of the first known
family members was Nikephoros Komnenos, who was governor of Vaspurakan in the 11th
century. Vaspurakan comprises modern-day southeast Turkey and northwest Iran, where
Khameneh is located. At the very least, we’ve established that Supreme Leader Khamenei bears
the name of a town that was in all likelihood named after the ancient Komnene family who also
originated in that region.
We will come back to the recent Supreme Leaders. For now, let’s go back in time to the Safavid
dynasty, which lasted from 1501 to 1722 and encompassed what is now Iran, Armenia,
Azerbaijan, and parts of the North Caucasus, Turkey, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria, and beyond.
This dynasty began with Ismail I, Shah of Iran. That nose should tell you something, as should
the name Ismail. The red hair is also curious.
Here’s the kicker – Ismail’s grandmother was Theodora Komnene, daughter of John IV
Komnenos, Emperor of Trebizond. So by calling the Safavid its own dynasty is more than a little
misleading, since it was just a continuation of the Komnene dynasty. Theodora’s mother was
Princess Bagrationi, daughter of Alexander I of Georgia, from the powerful House of Bagration.
The Bagrations were Jewish, claiming direct descent from King David of the Bible. This lends
more evidence to the fact that the Komnenes were Jewish, as they married into another Jewish
dynasty. In any case, this means the Komnene family was ruling Iran all the way up to 1722 at
the end of the Safavid dynasty.
Who ruled after that? The Safavid rule ended when Pashtun rebels besieged the capital city of
Isfahan and defeated Sultan Husayn, the “last” Safavid (Komnene) ruler. After a series of
military skirmishes and tug-of-wars, Iran fell into the hands of Karim Khan Zand, forming the
short-lived Zand dynasty.
Karim Zand (see the nose?) is known for opening up trade with Europe. As Wikipedia tell us:
During his reign, relations with Britain were restored, and he allowed the East India
Company to have a trading post in southern Iran.
Oh, really? That would make sense, since the Zands were Jewish. They don’t admit it outright, of
course, though see page 24 of this paper where we get a passing admission that Karim’s wife was
Jewish, and that the Zands appointed a Jew as governor of Shiraz. Now look up the surname
Zand and you’ll find almost exclusively Jewish people: Nathalie Zand, Polish-Jewish
neurologist; Nosson Zand, Chasidic rapper from Boston; and Shlomo Zand, professor at Tel
Aviv University. About the only Zand they don’t admit is Jewish is Kayvon Zand, who just
happens to be a descendent of the Zand dynasty. They do admit he’s a pervert. Kayvon started
the Zand Collective in New York City, a performance group whose act was banned from the
Highline Ballroom for being “too shocking.” In it, fire-eaters have sex on stage. He also began
an event called “Sex Fifth Avenue” which took place at the Museum of Sex, where it was
“successful in cementing Zand’s reputation for revitalizing NYC nightlife.” He also formed
Zandwagon, a modeling and casting agency that represents transgendered people. He’s also an
actor, playing a terrorist in RuPaul’s film Starrbooty and Elvis Presley on some Japanese show.
Here he is giving everyone the creeps on America’s Got Talent:
But here’s the thing about the Zand dynasty – it was really just a front for the Safavid/Komnene
dynasty. They admit that the Safavid prince Ismail III was the official Shah of Iran from 1750-
1773, during the Zand rule. Try to make sense of that. After overthrowing the Safavid dynasty,
they continued to let a Safavid occupy the throne.
After the Zand dynasty came the Qajar dynasty, whose founder was Agha Mohammad Khan
Qajar. It isn’t clear how he came to power, and it makes little sense considering he was a eunuch,
having been castrated as a young adult. When you’re castrated, you stop producing testosterone,
lose muscle and gain fat, and generally become effete – not the type to lust for military power.
Yet we are told he was a “cruel and rapacious” military tyrant.
Does that guy look cruel and rapacious to you? No, he looks like a neutered puppy, which is
exactly what he was. But notice how he is seated in his portrait and compare it to Karim Zand’s
portrait. They are positioned exactly the same, even down to the hands. They are signaling that
this is just a continuation of the same dynasty. That was my assumption based on the portraits
alone, but a peek over at geni.com shows that Agha Mohammad was in fact both a grandson and
son-in-law of the Zands, as well as a half-brother of a Safavid. They don’t tell you that at
Wikipedia. This means the Zand, Qajar, and Safavid dynasties are just one big dynasty stemming
from the Komnenes, which we can now extend all the way to 1925 with the exile of the last the
Qajar ruler, Ahmad Qajar.
[Miles: also remember that Zand becomes Sand/Sands, linking us to many Jewish people of that
name. Think writer George Sand, who did not choose that nom de plume by accident. She was
in the direct line of Augustus II the Strong and a cousin to Louis XVI. Of course Augustus was a
Hohenzollern, taking us in the maternal line back to Barbara Jagiellon. Also actor Julian Sand,
Israeli historian Schlomo Sand, fake German martyr Karl Sand, rear admiral Benjamin Sands (a
navy spook whose son James also became a rear admiral), fake IRA Bobby Sands (who allegedly
died in a hunger strike), Comfort Sands (founder of the Bank of New York), vampire author
Lynsay Sands, and the billionaire Sands family (Constellation Brands).]
So far, I’ve demonstrated – without more than a few scrolls through Wikipedia – that Iran has
been ruled by Jews since at least the eleventh century, and that all rulers have been, in one way
or another, Komnenes. Before I get to the next chapter – the Pahlavi dynasty – let me briefly
remind you that since the 1979 revolution Iran has been ruled by two leaders whose names are
Khomeini and Khamenei. Knowing what we now know, does it still seem so far-fetched that
these latest rulers might also be Komnenes? Is it really far-fetched to assume that a dynasty that
had been in place for more than eight centuries might still be in place today? I don’t think so.
On to the Pahlavis. Where did they come from, and how did they rise to power? We are told
Reza Pahlavi (above) was the son of Major Abbas-Ali Khan and Noush-Afarin. Khan is a title
that denotes that his father was a high-ranking figure, yet we know almost nothing about him.
Reza’s mother is an even blacker box; Wikipedia doesn’t even tell us her last name. We have to
flip over to geni.com, where it lists her as Noushafarin Ayromlou. That’s curious, seeing as Reza
also married an Ayromlou. Her name was Nimtaj Ayromlou:
Did he marry his cousin? Nimtaj was the daughter of Brigadier General Teymur Khan
Ayromlou. Another Khan – so he was a prominent figure as well. But they deny any connection
between this Brigadier General Ayromlou and Reza’s mother, even though Noush-Afarin was
also married to a prominent military leader. We’re really supposed to believe there was no
connection? Nimtaj’s mother is listed at geni.com as “Zahra ????”. Are we supposed to believe
nobody knows who the Queen of Iran’s mother was? This was the 20th century! Even stranger, if
we flip over to this website, royalark.net, we get a very detailed genealogy for Reza, except that
it lists his mother as Noush-Afarin née Zahra, even though it says she was the sister of Colonel
Abu’l Qasim Ayromlou. How could her maiden name be Zahra if her brother was an Ayromlou?
And remember, Zahra was supposed to be Reza’s mother-in-law’s name, not his own mother’s
maiden name. All this goes to show that Reza’s genealogy is being fudged, with his wife and
mother being jumbled together.
Wikipedia says Reza’s mother was a “Muslim immigrant from Georgia”. But back at
royalark.net we learn the Ayromlous were “a leading Georgian family” from Nakhchivan,
Azerbaijan. Here’s a little trivium on Nakhchivan – it’s traditionally considered the landing place
of Noah’s Ark, and Armenian tradition says Nakhchivan was founded by Noah. You can even
visit a mausoleum there that claims to hold his grave. Is that perhaps why the most thorough
genealogy for Reza Pahlavi is posted at a site called Royal Ark? Again, you ought to read this as
another clue. Not that Pahlavi descends from Noah, of course, but merely that he is another
crypto-Jew.
In support of that, royalark.net lists some of Reza’s ancestors as having the surname Pahlavan. A
search of that name on Wikipedia directs you to Pahlavuni, an Armenian noble family going all
the way back to the 10th century. They were an offshoot of the Kamsarakan noble family, that
was itself an offshoot of the House of Karen-Pahlav or Karen-Pahlevi, which goes back all the
way to the 300s AD. In the 11th century the Pahlavunis moved to Cilicia, where they were
known as the Hethumids. Guess who they intermarried with? That’s right – the Komnenes! Oi
vey! It’s really amazing how easily this all fits into place, isn’t it? In the 1300s the
Pahlav/Hethumid King Oshin of Armenia married Jeanne of Anjou (a.k.a. Joan of Taranto), the
daughter of Thamar Angelina Komnene. So the Pahlavi dynasty didn’t begin in 1925; it started
well over a millennium ago, being just another branch of the Komnene dynasty that have ruled
Iran forever. And did you notice the last four letters of the House of Karen-Pahlevi? This means
Pahlavi is a Levi.
Reza Pahlavi was born and bred in the military, rising to the rank of Colonel in the Iranian Army
in 1915, around age 37, and then to Brigadier General in the Persian Cossack Brigade. Then we
are supposed to believe Reza overthrew the Qajar dynasty and established his own. In that case,
why did he appoint the great-grandson of Fath Ali Qajar, one of the Qajar shahs, as his Minister
of War? This would be Amanullah Jahanbani. If you were overthrowing a dynasty, would you
appoint one of its family members as the head of your entire defense ministry? We’re told
Jahanbani was something of a traitor to his own family, being pivotal in the 1921 Persian coup
d’état that led to the establishment of the Pahlavi dynasty. At least that’s what it says on his
Wikipedia page. But if you flip over to the page on the 1920 coup, there isn’t a single mention of
him.
I invite you to research the Persian Cossack Brigade and tell me if its existence makes any sense.
Its function was as a “special operations” force completely independent of the imperial army. It
was set up in 1878 by the Qajar dynasty and styled after the Russian Cossacks, to the point that
they even wore Russian-style uniforms that were very different from all other Iranian military
dress. Even more bizarre, its commanders were exclusively Russian military leaders. Why
would the Qajars want their special ops force led by members of another country’s military?
Then suddenly, in 1920 – one year before the Persian Cossack-led coup – the Shah Ahmad Qajar
decides to make Reza Pahlavi the leader of the Persian Cossacks.
This was the first time a nonRussian was put in charge of the Persian Cossack Brigade. Why the sudden switch in policy? But the stranger thing about the coup is that it resulted in Reza rather than Jahanbani taking the
throne. At the time, Jahanbani was a Lieutenant General in the Iranian Army, a three-star rank.
As I said, Reza was a Brigadier General, a one-star rank, and that was in the Cossack brigade, a
much smaller operation than the main army. So Jahanbani, who was supposedly pivotal in the
coup and was a much higher-ranking military official than Reza, not to mention a relative of the
Shah, does all this work only to let Reza take control? Why would he support a coup against his
own family and not insist on appointing himself as the new de facto ruler?
Then the narrative really breaks down:
On February 18, 1921, the Cossacks reached Tehran meeting little resistance. On early
morning of February 21, they entered the city. Only several policemen, taken by surprise,
are said to had been killed or wounded in the center of Tehran. Backed by his troops,
Reza Khan forced the government to dissolve and oversaw his own appointment as
minister of war. Reza Khan also ensured that Ahmad, still ruling as shah, appointed as
prime minister Sayyed Ziaoddin Tabatabaee.
Of course! Another one of those easy coups, like the Beer Hall Putsch or Stalin’s rise to power.
These rogue military men just stroll into the capital city, put their finger on the first domino, and
topple the whole government! But notice how contradictory the story is. After we’re told Reza
forced the government to dissolve, we find him requesting that Ahmad Qajar – who is still the
Shah – appoint one of his buddies as prime minister. Wait, didn’t he just dissolve the
government? Isn’t the point of a coup to depose the king? Imagine a rogue US military leader
taking Washington by force, then walking into the White House and instead of arresting Trump,
merely requests that he change out some of his cabinet members. I can’t made heads or tails of
this nonsense, can you? It would be another four years until the Qajar dynasty was officially
ousted and Reza set up as Shah. How do they explain four years of the Qajars continuing to rule
a dissolved government?
Speaking of Jahanbani, did you know Reza’s granddaughter, Princess Shahnaz, married his son,
Khosrow Jahanbani? Remember, he is a direct descendent of the Qajar Shahs, so the Pahlavis
just ended up marrying into the royal family they had overthrown. Just like how the Qajars were
actually part of the Zand family that they supposedly overthrew. Here’s Khosrow:
[Miles: the head looks pasted in. It is too gray.] He doesn’t look like the son of a War Minister,
does he? I guess he went the hippie route and decided to become an indie filmmaker or
something. Funny how many kids of high-ranking military officers ended up becoming hippie
artists and rock stars in the 60s and 70s. Khosrow’s mother was Helen Kasminsky, “from the
Russian aristocracy”. A search on the name Kasminsky doesn’t bring up anyone but Helen, and
her genealogy is completely scrubbed on every corner of the internet. We don’t even get so much
as a first name of either parent. What does get a lot of hits is the name Kaminsky. As in Mel
Brooks, born Melvin Kaminsky, Jewish. And actor Danny Kaye, born David Kaminsky, also
Jewish. And Adolfe Kaminsky, also Jewish, who helped Jews immigrate to Palestine following
WWII. Also see the variant spelling Kaminski. As Miles already covered, the Kominskis were
Polish Jews who married into British nobility – see Gertrude Kaminski who married the Baronet
Graham in 1939. It so happens that Gertrude’s middle name was Helen, born right around the
same time as Khosrow’s mom. My guess is they were cousins. There is one other Helen
Kasminsky on the internet, who just happens to also be born around the same time as Khosrow’s
mom and even has an impressive genealogy posted online. And guess what? She is definitely
Jewish, having relatives like Weiss, Fassman, Richman, Cohen, Heim, Shendell, Cohen again,
Schack, Feinberg, Pearl, Cohen a third time (!), and Goldenberg. Lastly, I point you to Aaron
Kosminski, a Polish Jew who was a prime suspect in the fake Whitechapel murders. We’re told
the police confused him with another suspect who was in the same insane asylum as Kosminski,
a Jew named Aaron Cohen, who himself might have really been named Nathan Kaminsky.
That’s Helen. All this goes to show why they’ve thoroughly scrubbed Helen’s genealogy,
because it would show that the Pahlavis were related to Jews, which is one step away from
admitting they were Jewish themselves. This would throw their whole narrative off-balance,
since we’re supposed to believe Reza was a Nazi sympathizer, and his pro-Nazi sympathies
“seriously threatened Iranian Jewry.” In 1936 Hitler even sent Reza Shah a signed photograph of
himself with the greeting, “With the Best Wishes.” Wikipedia tells us:
Many gentile anti-Semites were preparing for Johoudkoshan (Massacre of the Jews) and
were warning Jews in the streets to leave Iran while they can. Nazi Germany had nightly
broadcasts in Persian and was calling many of the leading Iranian politicians who had
anti-German tendencies cryptojews. Bahram Shahrukh who was employed by German
radio performed fiery anti-Jewish broadcasts every night.
First of all, if you were a “gentile anti-Semite” (are there such things as Jewish anti-Semites?)*,
would you give your enemies some friendly advice to get out of town before they get massacred?
Then you get a lot of cracks in the narrative that Wikipedia does a poor job of plastering over:
The Pahlavi dynasty implemented modernizing reforms, which greatly improved the
life of Jews. The influence of the Shi’a clergy was weakened, and the restrictions on Jews
and other religious minorities were abolished…. [D]uring the reign of Reza Shah the
political and social conditions of the Jews changed fundamentally. Reza Shah prohibited
mass conversion of Jews and eliminated the concept of uncleanness of non-Muslims. He
allowed incorporation of modern Hebrew into the curriculum of Jewish schools and
publication of Jewish newspapers. Jews were also allowed to hold government jobs.
In other words, he didn’t merely tolerate the Jews but was actively philosemitic. That doesn’t
jive at all with Reza being a Nazi sympathizer, does it? Or it doesn’t in the mainstream story. In
Miles’ version it makes perfect sense.
Why would Reza let Jews publish their own newspapers, then turn around and allow the
Germans to broadcast antisemitic hate speech every night across his country? If you flip over to
this Wikipedia page, you get a feeble attempt to syncretize the disparities:
…even though Reza Shah was sympathetic to the Jews in the beginning, he became
distrusted of Jewish movements with the growth of Zionism. Reza Shah sought to unite
the different ethnic groups in Iran under the flag of nationalism.
Okay, but if you were trying to unite Persians and Jews under the same flag and deter the agenda
of Zionism, would you start broadcasting antisemitic propaganda and let the Jews think they’d
get massacred if they didn’t flee your country? No. In fact, you would do the exact opposite and
try to be as accommodating as possible to your Jewish population to make them stay – especially
since all the Jews who fled Iran went to Palestine, thus fulfilling the very objective of Zionism.
Either Reza was an idiot, or they’re trusting the rest of us who read this tripe are. I’ll give you
one guess which is the case.
This is a good place to briefly ferret out another burrow of fakery in the history of Iran: the Bahai
religion. Bahai was invented in Persia in the mid-1800s and preached the unity of all religions –
that Jesus, Muhammed, the Buddha, and so on, were just prophets or manifestations of the same
God being progressively revealed to mankind. As nice as that sounds, anyone who has studied
Bahai can tell the religion was not meant to unify and create peace among religions, but to
weaken and undermine them. Bahai is to Islam what LDS and Jehovah’s Witnesses are to
Christianity, attaching themselves to the same scriptures and general beliefs to dilute them,
create confusion, and ultimately steer society away from religion altogether. And like LDS and
Jehovah’s Witnesses, Bahai was a Jewish project – not a project of the religious Jews, of course,
but of the bankers and industrialists and political elites.
And, what do you know, Bahai was hatched by the same particular Jewish family that has been
ruling Iran from the beginning. The founder of Bahai was a “prophet” named Sayyid Ali
Muhammad Shirazi, known simply as “Bab”. I point you to his genealogy, where many odd
fudges are afoot, such as that his page shows no family connection aside from his wife, yet on his
wife’s page we get the whole kit and boodle, including her parents, siblings, and children. Do
they really have more genealogical information on her than her husband, who founded a
worldwide religion? That itself is a red flag. But the genealogist here gets his wife’s name
wrong, listing her as Fatimih while Wikipedia lists her as Khadijih. The genealogist lists the
Bab’s daughter as Princess Fatimih Begum Ayadi. A Google search pulls up nothing about her,
despite being a “princess”. It also says the Bab’s wife had a second husband, Sayyid Muhammad
Ali al Musavi al Safavi Shamsabadi Isfahani. That’s a mouthful, but did you catch the important
name? Safavi. Remember the Safavid dynasty was just an extension of the Komnene dynasty,
which means the Bab’s wife was at some point married to a Komnene. But it turns out the Bab
was also a Komnene. On this mouthful-of-a-name Safavi’s geni page the genealogist is kind
enough to quote an excerpt from a book by Edward Granville Brown, a British Orientalist who is
known for his study of Bahai history. He relates that this Safavi character was
…one of the original companions of the Bab…and a scion of the same royal race of the
Safavis (for both were descended from Shah Abbas the Great).
So Bahai came from the Jewish Komnenes. That explains the physical description of him as
“rather small in stature and very fair for a Persian.” It also explains why his remains were dug up
and reinterred in Israel.
That should also add a grain of salt (or a pile of something else) to everything you read about
Bahai, including the extent of the persecutions they’ve faced. For instance, we’re told during the
Pahlavi dynasty that General Nader Batmanghelich, chief of staff of the Iranian army, personally
took a pickaxe to the Bahai Center in Tehran and destroyed its dome on direct orders from the
Shah, because Bahai was perceived as a threat to the nationalistic vision of the Pahlavis. Here are
photos of the demolition:
I’ll take Pathetic Paste-Ups for 500, Alex. Notice the head of the man in the light suit on the far
left, and how it doesn’t quite match up with his body – even his tie looks pasted in. Also, why
are there men in business suits? Was this a military event or a groundbreaking ceremony? And
the shadows are all wrong. Look how washed out the General’s hand looks, then notice the man
leaning on the wall to the far right, whose left side is cast in dark shadows. Same inconsistency
with his dark watch. The watch is also a giveaway because it’s on the wrong hand. He is holding
the pickaxe as if he is lefthanded, with the dominant hand being on top. A left-hander would
wear his watch on his right hand. And who swings an axe like that, with their hands a foot and a
half apart?
Here’s another attempt, which is even worse. The smiling man with the mustache has clearly
been pasted in. And where’d all the people from the first photo go? And where’s the rest of the
demolition crew? Are we supposed to believe the General singlehandedly demolished a multistory dome – with a pickaxe? And here you see how much he looked like Hitler. Just a
coincidence, right? On a broader level, Bahai persecution makes no sense, since the Pahlavis
were trying to replace the Islamic identity of ummat (body of believers) with a more nationalistic
identity, or millat. Bahai presented the perfect religious complement to millat – validating and
uniting all the disparate ethnic and religious groups within Iran. Since Bahais constituted their
own group within those many groups, at the very least you’d want the Bahais to feel welcome in
the country you’re trying to politically unify.
Next in power was Reza’s son, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.
On his Wikipedia page, one of the first things we learn about him is that his lifelong best friend
and “twin” was Ernest Perron. Note the standard Jewish nose. Miles has already shown that
Perron is just a variant of Perez/Pereyre/Pereira/Penn, a Jewish name. He has also shown the
Perons of Argentina were Jewish, descended from the de Leons of Spain among others. They
admit nearly everything about Perron except that he was Jewish – including that he was a
flamboyant homosexual, an M16 informant, and an all-around snake in the grass who no one
besides the Shah liked. Wikipedia even admits that he “is considered to have had considerable
behind-the-scenes power in Iran during the Shah’s regime.” Yes, because he was clearly the
Shah’s lover. Don’t believe me? Perron was the only person besides the Shah’s wife who was
allowed in his bedroom. That puts us in mind of Lem Billings, JFK’s lover, who Jackie said had
been her “house guest since I was married.” Gore Vidal called Billings “the principal fag at
court”. Compare that to George Middleton, the British ambassador to Iran, who called Perron the
Shah’s “court jester”. A book alleging their homosexual relationship was published shortly after
the 1979 revolution, titled Ernest Perron, the Husband of the Shah of Iran. It was written by
Mohammad Pourkian. If you don’t get the joke in that last name, you need to lighten up. Here’s
a photo of Perron on a ski trip with the Shah:
The man front and center is Mohammad Pahlavi, with Perron on the left. Tell me, who looks
gayer in that picture? I’d say they’re evenly matched. You’ll argue that Pahlavi couldn’t be gay,
since he had several children. But as Miles has shown with the Kennedy family, it’s quite
possible to create the appearance of a family with photoshoots and paste-ups. Or you can always
rent children from SAG. Or your fake wives can be impregnated by someone else. I haven’t
seen a photo of Pahlavi with any of his wives in which he seemed remotely in love with them.
And his wives were very beautiful.
Mohammad was overthrown by Ayatollah Khomeini in the Iranian Revolution of 1979. On
whether the 1979 revolution was good or bad for Iranian Jews, the mainstream historians tie
themselves in knots trying to give a sensible answer. Wikipedia tells us that in late 1978, Jewish
community leaders met with Ayatollah Khomeini in Paris and “declared their support for the
revolution.” But Khomeini had been stirring up anti-Jewish sentiment for more than a decade,
and even while in exile in Paris he was known as an agitator, giving speeches against the Shah
and Israel. Khomeini said Pahlavi was too cozy with Israel and too benevolent toward Persian
Jews. In that case, why would the Jews of Paris declare their support for a hardline conservative
Muslim who wanted to overthrow the Jew-friendly Shah? Then the mainstream backpedals and
tells us Pahlavi actually became distrustful of the Jews toward the end of his reign, doing an
about-face just like his father:
During an interview with Mike Wallace in 1976 Shah spoke of a highly organized and
influential Jewish lobby in the United States that controls banking, politics and
media and is pushing people around for the interests of Israel.
Yousef Cohen, last Jewish representative of Iranian Senate describes in his memoirs that
Shah became suspicious of Jewish community in his final years because most of the
international criticism about lack of freedom in Iran and military style of government
came from Jewish authors…. Cohen describes that Shah believed that there is an
international Jewish conspiracy against him to end his reign as the king.
[Miles: there’s another fake Jewish anti-Semite for you.]
You don’t say! In fact, there is a highly organized international Jewish cartel that controls
banking, politics, and media – and the Pahlavis were a part of it. Mohammad Pahlavi was
playing his part to run Persia in the interests of the international bankers and their oil companies,
being himself a crypto-Jew, just like his father. Recall that Mohammad’s son-in-law was
Kohsrow Jahanbani, a Jew through his mother Helen Kasminsky. That’s like trying to sell Trump
as an antisemitic conspiracy theorist when his son-in-law is Jared Kushner.
The Yousef Cohen referenced above is likely Yosef Hamadani Cohen, who would become Chief
Rabbi of Iran in the 1990s. According to Wikipedia, Cohen was one of the Jewish community
leaders “instrumental in managing the collaborations between the Jews and the revolutionaries.”
In other words, he was propagandizing Iran’s Jewish communities to support an explicitly
Islamic revolution. As it turns out, the revolution was not about religion at all. It was about
keeping Iran under the thumb of the international elites while maintaining the appearance of real
change.
Before I move on to Khomeini, let’s find out what happened to the Pahlavis after the ’79
revolution. Nimtaj Ayromlou, Reza’s wife, was “exiled” to Beverly Hills. Poor lady. What a
terrible exile. Let’s stop right there and revisit the photo of her that I included earlier. Knowing
she ended up in Beverly Hills sheds light on that photo, doesn’t it? It doesn’t look like the photo
of a royal, but of a Hollywood actress. That’s the most famous photo of her – not bedecked in
her royal attire at the palace, but in a studio set with mood lighting and a nondescript
background. More Katherine Hepburn than Queen of Iran, no?
It turns out there are a lot of Iranian Jews in Beverly Hills, which I didn’t know before now. That
is, I knew there were lots of Jews, but not Iranian ones. According to Wikipedia:
Persian Jews make up a sizable proportion of the population of Beverly Hills, California.
Persian Jews constitute a great percentage of the 26% of the total population of Beverly
Hills that identifies as Iranian-American.
Since basically all of Beverly Hills’ 34,000 residents are Jewish, that means 1 in 4 people you
meet there are Iranian. Demographically speaking, that’s a massive number. And it’s just further
evidence that the Pahlavis were Jewish, since “a great percentage” (like 100 percent?) of Iranians
in Beverly Hills are Jewish. Nimtaj ended up living at the house of Walter Annenberg, a Jewish
media mogul who owned The Philadelphia Inquirer, TV Guide, the Daily Racing Form and
Seventeen magazine. Want to guess Walter’s wife’s name? Leonore Cohn. The number of
Cohens we’ve encountered in this paper is starting to add up.
This LA Times article from 1988 tells us what happened to the crown prince, Reza II:
Today home is a well-guarded estate in Virginia, close to the District of Columbia, where
he lives with his 19-year-old wife, Yasmine, daughter of an Iranian businessman.
Pahlavi now oversees a clandestine network that he says has operatives in and out of Iran,
communicating by telephone and through sophisticated electronics, ready to seize power
at the propitious moment.
By choosing to live near Washington, he acknowledges, he leaves himself open to
recurring charges that he is a tool of the CIA.
If you think any of that is real, you’ve read one too many spy novels. This is not how the real
world works. Reza II was not operating his own intelligence network out of his home in Virginia
with “sophisticated electronics.” Were his informants emailing him secret messages from their
dial-up AOL? And if any of this were true, he certainly wouldn’t let the LA Times publicize it.
And since he is a tool of the CIA, they wouldn’t have let him publicize these activities, either.
[Miles: or, the CIA is a tool of Pahlavi. He is of the Families that run the CIA. And his family
still runs Iran, with the Ayatollahs as frontmen, giving the appearance of fundamentalism. The
script of the past forty years required Iran as an enemy state, not as an ally.]
Now we get to 1979. The Iranian Revolution was an Islamic revolution, its objective being to
overthrow the secular Pahlavi dynasty that everyone in Iran knew was bought and sold by
Western oil interests. The people of Iran weren’t dupes; they knew very well that the oil
companies (owned by Jews) and a few Iranians at the top (also Jewish, as I have shown) were
profiting immensely from their country’s resources, while the people of Iran were getting the
shaft. Nothing new there. But we’re told the revolution successfully deposed these corrupt,
parasitic Pahlavis and installed a more traditional, anti-West, anti-oil Islamic regime. But
suppose for a moment that you were the elite Western powers-that-be who controlled a puppet
regime in Iran. Hypothetically, would it make sense to manufacture a revolution and install
another puppet regime that pretends to be opposed to you? What would be the benefit of doing
such a thing? One strategy comes to mind immediately. If the opposition were fake, an oil crisis
could be easily manufactured to look real. The oil crisis would be a massive boon for you, since
it would cause the price of oil to skyrocket. Since you, the Western elite, own the oil companies,
your profit margins would skyrocket, too. That’s exactly what happened during the 1979 oil
crisis, when oil production in Iran plummeted and the price per barrel of crude oil more than
doubled. Other countries such as Iraq and Russia increased their oil production, causing total
global production to decrease only 4% that year. So in our hypothetical scenario, you,
stakeholder of all the oil companies, still hit your topline revenue while massively increasing
your margins on your Iran output, since you still control Iran and thus control the price of Iranian
oil. (Remember, the law of supply and demand goes out the window when you’ve captured the
entire market.)
There’s also the more obvious benefit to you of installing a fake opposition, which is having a
bogeyman at your disposal to justify defense spending increases. Iran has proven an extremely
successful bogeyman, from its fake nuclear program to its fake Islamic extremists.
Sayyid Ruhollah Mousavi Khomeini was the leader of the revolution and subsequently the first
Supreme Leader of the new Islamic Republic of Iran. At this point it’s almost a given that he’s
related to all the previous rulers of Iran, but let’s go through the drill anyhow. Besides the
obvious similarity of his last name to Komnene, which I’ve already noted, we also see another
familiar name: Mousavi. Recall that the founder of Bahai’s close confident and fellow Safavid
descendent was Sayyid Muhammad Ali al Musavi al Safavi Shamsabadi Isfahani. When you
search the surname Mousavi, Wikipedia takes you to this page, with a list of notable people who
have that surname, including Khomeini. But it doesn’t tell you anything about the name itself,
such as its origin or meaning. Strangely, in the “See Also” section at the bottom, it links you to
this page for the surname Al-Musawi. It’s strange because it’s evident this is the same surname
as Mousavi, listing many of the same people as the Mousavi page. Why does Wikipedia have
two pages for the same surname? Either they’ve let one slip past the goalie here or they’re
intentionally tipping their hand. Either way, it’s quite a hand-tip. Here we read that the name
indicates a “prestigious and highly respected family with a transnational identity.” It lists
Khomeini as a member of this family and then asserts, plain as day:
…he descended from the Safavid dynasty.
Hello! Come again?! No, seriously, am I really the first to realize that every single ruler of Iran in
known history is related? I guess I shouldn’t be that surprised. They admit all the U.S. presidents
are related. Why not every Iranian ruler? That page drops some other great bombshells. For
instance, Abbas al-Musawi, the founder of Hezbollah, is also a family member. Now we
understand why he was so “inspired” by Khomeini to start his faux-terrorist group. They’re
relatives. And yes, I use the present tense, as I assume the assassination of al-Musawi and his
whole family by the Israeli Defense Forces in 1992 was faked, in response to Hezbollah’s
equally fake kidnapping of Israeli soldiers and U.S. Marine officer William Higgins. The alMusawi page also gives us names of related families, which include Sadaat – think Anwar – and
Husseini – think Saddam and, of course, Barack Hussein Obama. By the way, I can’t find
anywhere on the Internet an admission that Obama is a relative of the Husseini (and therefore
Musavi, Safavid, and Komnene) family. But here’s the photo given at geni.com of the last man
in his lineage with the name Hussein:
That’s supposed to be Barack’s grandfather, Hussein Obama. That head has clearly been pasted
onto a fake body. What gives? In his autobiography, Barack says his grandfather looked “almost
oriental.” Does that man look oriental to you? No, but Barack’s ghostwriter was giving you a
clue. That’s not Hussein Obama because Hussein was a Persian Jew, not a Kenyan. That is, he
may have had Kenyan citizenship, but his ancestors were from Persia. There is a long history of
Persians in Kenya and other parts of Africa – see the Shirazi people.
1
These were Persian traders
who became extremely wealthy off the local commodities, including ivory, gold, and slaves.
There were not your average Persians, of course – they were Jewish. Gold mining and slavery in
Africa have long been Jewish industries. Obama’s ancestors were likely some of these PersianJewish slave traders.
1Recall that Shirazi was the last name of the Bab, the founder of Bahai.
Khomeini’s ancestors moved from northwest Persia to India, settling in Kintoor in the 1800s
before moving back to Iran in the 1830s. They took on the last name “Hindi” and the Ayatollah
still used this name in his youth.
Let’s examine some photos of Khomeini:
The one above is bizarre for several reasons. Again, why is the contrast so blown out?
Everything is either extremely light or dark, obscuring all facial details. I’m not even sure which
one is supposed to be Khomeini. Could be either of the last two. The whole scene has a spooky
quality. I half-expect there to be a crystal ball in the foreground. I’m unconvinced this is an
actual photo of Khomeini.
The next one is abysmal:
The shadows are all wrong and all three heads have clearly been pasted in. And what’s with the
man on the left and his oddly proportioned arms?
Despite his being sold as a hardcore Muslim who brought Iran under much more conservative
political-religious reins, it turns out Khomeini had quite a progressive past:
Khomeini studied Greek philosophy and was influenced by both the philosophy of
Aristotle, whom he regarded as the founder of logic, and Plato, whose views “in the field
of divinity” he regarded as “grave and solid”.
That defies all accepted notions of conservative Islam. Do you think any real devout Muslims are
consulting Plato for their theology? Would you expect that of an Islamic religious leader?
As a scholar and teacher, Khomeini produced numerous writings on Islamic philosophy,
law, and ethics. He showed an exceptional interest in subjects like philosophy and
mysticism that not only were usually absent from the curriculum of seminaries but were
often an object of hostility and suspicion.
That confirms my point. The average Muslim would have viewed – and did view – Khomeini’s
scholarly interests as highly suspect. Yet he skated through, becoming a prominent religious
leader without any resistance. That would be like finding out Billy Graham was an avid student
of astrology, or that your local church pastor wrote mystic poems inspired by Gnosticism.
Wouldn’t that raise a few alarms? By the way, Gnosticism was another subject Khomeini studied
– another red flag. Gnostic and esoteric philosophy has long been the root of many anti-religion
projects, including Theosophy. It looks more and more like Khomeini was part of an ongoing
project to weaken and undermine Islam, not to strengthen it.
This BBC article describes Khomeini’s rise to power accurately when it says he “stepped off the
plane from Paris and founded the Islamic Republic.” So it’s that easy to found a new
government, eh? And in the middle of the most geopolitically strategic region in the world! It
helps when you’re just another CIA asset, which the mainstream pretty much now admits. See
this Guardian article that discusses recently declassified CIA documents showing Khomeini had
extensive communications with the CIA leading up to the revolution, and as far back as 1963,
when he wrote to the CIA that he was “not opposed to American interests in Iran.” This is the
man who would later call America the Great Satan, mind you. This Wikipedia article enumerates
the many instances Khomeini has been accused of a American or British intelligence asset,
including the man he overthrew, Mohammad Pahlavi, who said, “If you lift up Khomeini’s beard,
you will find MADE IN ENGLAND written under his chin.” Which is the pot calling the kettle
black.
Some have even put forward the theory that Khomeini’s father was a Brit named William
Richard Williamson, a representative of the Anglo-Persian Oil Company. This theory apparently
has enough legs that Forbes published an article about it in 2009. However, I think it’s more
misdirection. Judging by the only photo of the father you can find online (and not on a very
reputable-looking site), he looks neither very British nor very much like Khomeini. But they may
be giving us a clue here. See the Williamson baronets of East Markham, including several
William Williamsons. The John Singer Sargent portrait posted at Wikipedia is titled “William
Hedworth Williamson, 10th baronet”. But the page tells us the 10th baronet was Charles
Hedworth, not William. At thepeerage.com we see William listed as Charles’ younger brother,
born 1906. The Williamson baronets are being mixed up, which I doubt is accidental. Sargent
wouldn’t have mistakenly painted the brother of the baronet or gotten the baronet’s name wrong.
William Williamson was an Army Major who died on October 31, 1942 “at Middle East.” The
dates are wrong for this William Williamson to be Khomeini’s father, but then again we see from
the Sargent painting that basic facts about him have been fudged.
Here is a photograph of the 8th baronet, Hedworth Williamson.
I see more of a resemblance to Khomeini. Based on age, this could’ve been Khomeini’s
grandfather or great uncle. But do you know who really resembles Khomeini?
I’m not the first person to notice this. Does Sean Connery have any family linkage to the
Williamson baronets? You bet. Connery’s maternal grandmother was Helen Forbes Ross. In the
peerage we find a Lord Forbes marrying a Hunter. William Hedworth Williamson’s mother was
Phyllis Hunter, daughter of Lt. Col. Charles Hunter. The Williamsons are also related to Rosses
in the peerage – see George Williamson Ross of Pitcalnie, born 1903. I am throwing this out
there as fodder for future research, if anyone is so inclined.
We’re told there were many competing factions vying for power during the ’79 revolution,
including the pro-Pahlavi secularists, the anti-Pahlavi secularists, the communists and “Islamic
socialists”, and various traditional Islamic movements. The Khomeinists were only a subset of
the various Islamic movements, and in the broader scheme of the revolution they were not
considered serious contenders. As you can imagine, most of the country’s Muslims didn’t have
much of an appetite for revolution – they simply wanted to practice their religion freely and have
local autonomy. So Khomeini ending up on the throne was highly improbable, and that alone
should garner suspicion. Given that all other coups and revolutions in the 20th century turned out
to be manufactured by the existing powers for their own benefit, you should assume the same
here. Contrary to what the BBC would have you believe, real revolutions can’t be proxied from
another country (remember, Khomeini was in exile in Paris during the revolution), and founding
a new government isn’t as easy as stepping off a plane. By pretty much any mainstream
interpretation of the events, Iran was handed to Khomeini on a silver platter.
This suggests to me that much of the revolution was manufactured. Not that there weren’t
demonstrations, arrests, or deaths. But their magnitude has been inflated in the official records.
The appearance of mass civil unrest, senseless violence, and global volatility suits the interests of
the crypto-rulers more than the appearance of stability and predictability. See the now-trendy
concept of VUCA, which they admit originated with the U.S. Army War College. In other
words, the Army decided to start telling its students they live in a Volatile, Unpredictable,
Complex, and Ambiguous world, and everyone in the private sector parroted them. But we don’t
live in a VUCA world. We live in a world of unambiguous causality. They tell you otherwise to
keep you from asking simple questions and approaching subjects rationally. You’re just
supposed to throw your hands up and say, “It’s a crazy world out there”. But it only appears
VUCA for those who don’t understand that a small group of elites are pulling all the strings – are
creating the VUCA intentionally. And where it’s too risky or expensive to manufacture real
VUCA, they simply create the appearance of it through newspapers, television, and social media.
If there is a cause for the VUCA – if you can trace it back to a real person or group who is
profiting from it – then the VUCA ceases to exist. Poof, it’s gone. As a strange as it sounds,
knowing the world is run by despicable people helps you stay sane.
Outing the current Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, is just gravy at this point. Khamenei is the
spectacled man in the center of the photo above. He would have been around 30 years old when
that photo was taken during one of the demonstrations, and he was a key figure of the revolution,
being a close confidant of Khomeini and having just co-founded the Islamic Republican Party.
Several things don’t make sense already. Why would the Pahlavis have exiled Khomeini during
this time but allowed Khamenei, a key figure of the IRP, to remain in Iran? The IRP claimed to
have millions of members and supporters, but in the photo above we find Khamenei as just one
of the crowd, and looking rather disinterested at that. Wouldn’t he be helping stage the protests
and giving speeches? I’m not entirely convinced Khamenei was in that photo to begin with. He
seems out of touch with everything going on around him, gesticulating toward someone who
isn’t there.
Here is the only childhood photo of Khamenei we’re provided. Just like Khomeini’s boyhood
photo, this one has been heavily doctored. His face is totally washed out and somewhat blurry,
yet his scarf is crisp with textural detail. And notice the unnatural dark line where the scarf meets
his jaw and neck. The line where his head covering meets his head is similarly too clean. His
hairline also appears to be penciled in, probably because they had to remove his original hair in
order to make his head fit into the clothes around him.
Outing him genealogically is easy enough, now that we know what to look for. His middle name
is Hosseini, linking us again to the Musavi/Mousawi family and thus the Safavids and
Komnenes. We can link him to the Komnenes in another way, as well. Khamenei’s recent
ancestry has been pretty well scrubbed, but they do admit he is a descendent of Ali ibn Husayn,
born in 659. When we flip over to his Wikipedia page, we learn he was related to the Byzantine
emperors through princess Miriam, as well as to King David. Remember the Bagrations, Jews
intermarried with the Komnenes who also claimed direct descent from King David. Miriam was
a Christian whose husband, the Persian King Khosrow II, first brought Jerusalem under
Byzantine rule. Khosrow was a member of the House of Sasan which ruled Persia (Sasanian
Empire) from 224 to 651. If you follow Khosrow’s direct paternal line back to the early 300s,
you get to Sasanian Emperor Shapur II.
That’s a coin minted with Shapur’s visage. See the nose? It turns out he was not first in line to
the throne:
When Hormizd II died in 309, he was succeeded by his son Adur Narseh, who, after a
brief reign which lasted a few months, was killed by some of the nobles of the empire.
They then blinded the second and imprisoned the third…. The throne was reserved for
the unborn child of Hormizd II’s Jewish wife Ifra Hormizd, which was Shapur II. It is
said that Shapur II may have been the only king in history to be crowned in utero, as the
legend claims that the crown was placed upon his mother’s womb while she was
pregnant.
In other words, “some of the nobles” were the kingmakers, and they decided for no clear reason
that the successor should be Hormizd’s Jewish son. That itself is the clear reason, since nothing
else set this particular son apart from the others. That also means these nobles were likely Jewish
themselves, else why would they want a Jew on the throne? But who were these nobles? They
don’t tell us, but we can assume it was one of the Seven Great Houses of Iran that held influence
during the Sasanian rule. One of those houses has already come up in this paper: The House of
Karen-Pahlavi. We have already established that they later intermarried with the Komnenes,
meaning they were also crypto-Jewish. So these same crypto-Jewish families that came out of
present-day Armenia/Northwest Iran have been keeping Jews on the throne for as long as they’ve
been there.
Bringing us back to Khamenei, I’ve shown that he was a descendent of the House of Sasan, who
were Jewish since 309 A.D. when Shapur II was crowned in utero. We can also link him to the
Pahlavi dynasty. Another one of Khameini’s ancestors is Sultan al-Ulama Ahmad. A search on
him directs us to the Sharif al-Ulama family, descendants of the Musavis, one of whom is
Mohammad Amir Khatami, general of the Iranian air force during the Pahlavi reign who married
Reza Pahlavi’s daughter, Princess Fatimeh.
I don’t find it necessary to look into Iran’s lesser political leaders to see if they are also Jewish,
but we can assume they are. Take, for example, former president Mahmoud “Jew Hater”
Ahmadinejad. A cursory search of “Ahmadinejad Jewish” takes us to this Telegraph article,
which does the work for us:
A photograph of the Iranian president holding up his identity card during elections in
March 2008 clearly shows his family has Jewish roots.
A close-up of the document reveals he was previously known as Sabourjian – a Jewish
name meaning cloth weaver.
The Sabourjians traditionally hail from Aradan, Mr. Ahmadinejad’s birthplace, and the
name derives from “weaver of the Sabour”, the name for the Jewish Tallit shawl in
Persia. The name is even on the list of reserved names for Iranian Jews compiled by
Iran’s Ministry of the Interior.
[Miles: so, Ahmadinejad is another fake Jewish anti-Semite.]
That was easy. Then there’s the current president, Hassan Rouhani. They scrub any possible ties
to Fuad Rouhani, an Iranian oil executive and the first Secretary-General of OPEC. The goal of
OPEC was allegedly to counteract Western oil interests and funnel more of the oil profits back to
the citizens of the producing countries. I see no evidence of that ever happening. As expected,
OPEC was just the controlled opposition hatched by the Western oil industrialists themselves.
Fuad Rouhani’s daughter married the first cousin of Empress Farah Pahlavi, and as we know, the
Pahlavis gave Western oil interests an open door to Iran’s oil resources. My guess is Hassan is a
nephew of Fuad, a connection that is being scrubbed for obvious reasons. Fuad’s wife’s name
was Rohan. A common spelling of Rouhani is Rohani. So her name was Rohan Rohani? Here’s
the thing: Rohan is a common Jewish name. See Rohan DeSilva, writer for Atlanta Jewish
Times, and Susan Rohan, Holocaust survivor who was born in Prague to an “affluent family.”
Also see the fake Jerusalem Mosque bomber, Denis Michael Rohan. See also the spooky Rohan
family of France, including Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc, Grand Master of the Order of St. John:
Note the Maltese crosses on his gown.
In closing, I’d like to point out that we’ve encountered a disproportionate number of Cohens in
this paper. Miles has suggested Cohen/Kohen may be itself be a variant of Komnene, and I think
this paper only strengthens that hunch.2
This means the rulers of Iran that I’ve covered – or rather
uncovered – in this paper are not just Jews but specifically Levites, from the priestly tribe. It is
becoming more apparent that the Cohens have historically played the part of kingmakers or
handlers, managing people and influencing events mostly behind the scenes. In a sense, they are
fulfilling the same role as the original Levites did, only on a secular level. Whereas the Old
Testament priests were the mediators between God and his people, the post-Israelite Kohens
have become the mediators between the upper Families and the lower Families, or between the
Families and the rest of us. See the Wikipedia page for kingmaker, which lists Samuel – who
installed King David – as the first historical example. Can you guess what tribe Samuel belonged
to?
*Miles: actually, there are a lot of fake Jewish anti-Semites, see Ezra Pound, David Irving, and
many others.
See next page, below footnote, for update.
2You may still be unconvinced of the Komnene = Kohen connection from a purely linguistic standpoint. There’s no
evidence of a morphology from one to the other. Granted, but suppose there were a name that was phonetically
somewhere between the two, that might suggest a link? We have that in the name Komen. That surname appears
most frequently in Kenya. It also appears at a comparatively high frequency in both the Netherlands and Israel. Do
you think these are Kenyan émigrés? I doubt it. They are Jewish Komens. Think of infamous breast cancer victim
Susan Goodman Komen, who was Jewish. (Susan was born on October 31 – indicating a spook project. Did Susan
really die of breast cancer? Did she die at all? Probably not.) And since the name is very rare overall, we may assume
it’s a variant of another, more common name. As in, Kohen. And of course Komen gives us Kaminsky, etc.
Update, June 13, 2019: A reader pointed Miles and me to the current Uber CEO, Dara
Khosrowshahi. That would be Khosrow-Shah-i. Wikipedia conveniently alerts us to the fact that
“Khosrow” and “Shah” both mean “king”, so the Uber CEO’s name is basically “Dara from the
King of Kings.” You may know that during the imperial age of Iran, the shah’s full title was
“Shahanshah”, or King of Kings. My reader suggests there might be a connection between Dara
and Khosrow Jahanbani and/or the Pahlavis. Indeed, the name Khosrowshahi strikes me as very
unusual for someone who doesn’t claim royal descent. According to forebears.io, there are only
189 people in the world with the name Khosrowshahi, almost all of whom live in Canada (26) or
the U.S (108). Far more live in North America, in fact, than in Iran, which only boasts 21. We
are told the name derives from the town of Khosrowshah, which was named after Khusrau Shah,
a Persian ruler from the 10th century. He was part of the Musafirid dynasty. Look familiar? Take
the first six letters: Musafi, a.k.a. Musavi. So we’re being given the same old runaround with the
same old families, being told these families were named for their towns when it’s the other way
around. The numbers don’t make sense, anyway. If people from Khosrowshah bear the name of
their village, why are there 189 of them? There are currently 22,000 people living in
Khosrowshah, so it’s not exactly the boonies.
This raises another head-scratcher. Remember Khosrow II, the Jewish ruler crowned in utero. If
Khosrow means king, then that would have been his title, not his name. Are we supposed to
believe he was just called King? The word probably shares its roots with other words for king,
like Caesar, Kaiser, Czar, etc. In other words, it’s primarily a title rather than a name. Wikipedia
bears this out, as virtually all notable people with the name Khosrow have been rulers. So the
name is a huge red flag, and it should come as no surprise that Khosrow Jahanbani just happened
to marry into the royal family. His name proves that he was from royalty before he married a
Pahlavi. His last name is also a clue. Jahan is a Persian word meaning “world” and Ban is a
noble title derived from an older word meaning “wealth” or “prince”. So literally every part of
his name speaks to him being from international wealth and royalty. My hunch is that both the
names Jahanbani and Khosrowshah were simply created by these crypto-offspring of the
Komnenes, since they had to ditch any identifiers from their lineage but couldn’t bear not
keeping some sort of royal marking.
In support of that, we find back at Royal Ark that one of Khosrow Jahanbani’s relatives, Lt.
General Shahzada Rohollah Jahanbani, “changed his surname from Jahanbani to Keykavoussi in
1938.” That’s right, he just up and changed it. This was before the Jahanbanis married into the
Pahlavi dynasty. We can follow these Keykavoussis to L.A., where the Lt. General’s grandson
Ali was arrested in his parents’ Bel-Air mansion for the shooting of his ex-girlfriend and her new
boyfriend in 1995. We also find them making fake modern art being curated by an Anna de
Aguilar (Jewish). Point being, the Jahanbanis have a record of randomly changing their last
name. Could the Khosrowshahis have formerly been Jahanbanis? Or Pahlavis? Or Komnenes?
The first clue is that the town of Khosrowshah is in Northwest Iran, up near the border of
Armenia, in the area once ruled by the Komnenes. We would have expected that, wouldn’t we?
Khosrowshahi’s uncle is billionaire business magnate Hassan Khosrowshahi, who lives in
Vancouver. Wikipedia says Hassan was “born into a wealthy family in Tehran” in 1940. His
father, Ali, founded the Minoo Industrial Group, a manufacturing and distribution conglomerate
focused on pharma, cosmetics, and food. They held the exclusive license to distribute Nestlé
products in Iran from 1954 to 1981. They allegedly were forced to flee Iran during the
revolution, at which point their company was nationalized and the family wealth was
confiscated. Yet within one year of being in Canada Hassan founded the Future Shop chain
stores, which in a mere 8 years became Canada’s largest computer and consumer electronics
retailer in the country. Amazing how Hassan had the foresight to ride the wave of personal
computer technology, isn’t it? You will say it was a result of his entrepreneurism and hard work
inherited from his family. I’ll tell you what he inherited: their big ol’ pile of money, which was
never confiscated. This is how Dara became the CEO of Uber, how Dara’s cousin Amir
cofounded an AI tech company that was acquired by Intel for $408 million, how some of his
cousins are Google execs, how some other cousins sold their startup to MySpace back in 2009
for $20 million and went on to found Code.org, and how another relative Darian Shirazi became
the first intern at Facebook and later founded a lucrative big data software company. This is just
more evidence that none of the so-called entrepreneurs that grace all the magazine covers and
strut around the TED stage in ripped jeans and a sport coat telling you to go “change the world”
and “be a disruptor” ever got where they are by merit. They got there because they were always
on the inside track, tied to the Family money.
Since we’re on the topic of Uber, I invite you to read this article published last month in
American Affairs, which reveals that Uber actually has higher operating costs than the
competitors it displaced and has not increased taxi productivity or solved any industry problems.
Isn’t capitalism built on the idea that competition forces companies to lower consumer prices
through increased efficiency? Au contraire! The article correctly concludes that “Uber’s longerterm goal was to eliminate all meaningful competition and then profit from this quasi-monopoly
power.” Or as one famous capitalist put it, “competition is sin.”
More importantly, I hope you noticed what my reader did – the name Darian Shirazi. The
Khosrowshahis are related to Shirazis, and we already saw in my paper that the Shirazis are
related to the Musavis, Safavis, and Komnenes. My reader also noted facial similarities between
Darian Shirazi and the Pahlavis. Here is Darian (left) beside Reza II, the exiled crown prince
who lives outside D.C.
Same Gonzo nose, same mouth, same eyebrows. They could be father and son there. We can
draw a connection between the Khosrowshahis and Khosrow Jahanbani’s family specifically. If
we return to Royal Ark, we can see where some of Khosrow’s relatives relocated after the
revolution. Several of them landed in Seattle, same hometown as our Uber CEO, and near
Vancouver of course. We find a Behrokh Jahanbani dying in Kirkland, a Seattle suburb, as
recently as 2009. Seattle is in King County, Washington.
Let’s look a little more closely at Dara’s family connections. His wife is Sydney Shapiro – a
Jewish name. Think pundit Ben Shapiro, NPR correspondent Ari Shapiro, comedian and
filmmaker J. David Shapiro, and Nazi defense attorney David Israel Shapiro [Miles: also O. J.’s
defense attorney Robert Shapiro]. We already covered his Shirazi relative and a few of his supersuccessful “entrepreneurial” relatives, but this Business Insider article lists another one, his
brother Kaveh Khosrowshahi, a managing director at Allen & Co., the investment bank best
known for its ultra-exclusive Sun Valley conference. A whitepages.com search finds that Kaveh
is related to Kathleen Grant Khosrowshahi of Seattle, as well as James Dover Grant. Do you
know who that is? I didn’t either, until I found Lee Child. That is the penname of author James
Dover Grant, CBE, famous for his bestselling Jack Reacher novels. Notice he is a CBE, so he
is in the peerage. But he was already there, since he is doubtless a descendent of the Grant
baronets. There’s no other way he could become a bestselling novelist or be related to the
Jahanbanis – which, by the way, is not admitted anywhere. On a related note, you may know that
Khosrow Jahanbani’s niece is Christiane Amanpour, the award-winning CNN journalist. Fun
fact about Amanpour: she is mentioned several times and even once appeared on the show
Gilmore Girls.
[Miles: interesting, but that is a paste-up or composite greenscreen. Notice how Amanpour’s hair
is grayed out for no good reason. The darks in her hair should match the darks in the other
women’s hair, but doesn’t.]
Character Rory is obsessed with her and wants to become a foreign correspondent someday just
like her. In the episode, Amanpour is a guest at Rory’s mom’s inn. Rory’s mom is played by
Lauren Graham (shown above left, with Amanpour center). Remember a Kaminski married one
of the Graham baronets in 1939, and Khosrow Jahanbani’s mom was a Kasminsky/Kaminski.
That means Amanpour and Lauren Graham are likely related. Don’t believe me? How about this:
Lauren Graham grew up outside D.C. (her father is a prominent candy industry lobbyist) and
went to school at Langley High School in Fairfax, VA, less than a mile from CIA headquarters.
Guess where several Jahanbanis ended up after the revolution? Fairfax, and at least two of them
went to Langley High School, right around the same time as Lauren. Now, to bring us full circle,
Lauren Graham’s mom is Donna Grant. Let me diagram it for you: Jahanbani Kaminski
Graham Grant Khosrowshahi. Yet another connection.
[Miles: I think Koslow’s Furs also ties in here, since Koslow and Kosrow are just nudges of the
same name. The letters “l” and “r” are often interchangeable, especially for non-English
speakers. Think of the way the Japanese can’t tell the difference.]
SOURCE:
https://mileswmathis.com/iran.pdf
Ιαπωνια, Ιραν, Μεση Ανατολη, συμφωνία, Μνημόνιο, Τραμπ, Peace deal, negotiations, Memorandum of Understanding
SMS, texts, text messages, Ιράν, NBC News, Επίθεση στο Ιράν, Πόλεμος, ΗΠΑ, Ντόναλντ Τραμπ, Drones, ΚΟΣΜΟΣBenjamin Netanyahu is dead, Ο Μπενιαμίν Νετανιάχου είναι νεκρός, California, Gavin Newsom, California newsΕΛΛΑΔΑ, Ντουμπάι, C-130, Πρέσβης, Ελευσίνα, Ηνωμένα Αραβικά Εμιράτα, kc-135 crash, Ruhollah Khomeini, Ali Khamenei
Iran Conflict, Ακρωτήρι Κύπρου , Μπαχρέιν, έκρηξη στην Κύπρο, σύγκρουση στον Κόλπο, πόλεμος Ιράν-Ισραήλ, RAF Akrotiri, αντίποινα από το Ιράν, Ισραήλ, Μάρτιος 2026, κλιμάκωση στη Μέση Ανατολή, προειδοποιήσεις για πυραύλους, Κατάρ, RAF Ακρωτηρίου, drone Shahed, ΗΑΕ, επίθεση συμμάχων των ΗΠΑ, Τραμπ, Ντόναλντ Τραμπ, Ιράν, Ισραήλ, Λευκός Οίκος, σύγκρουση Ιράν-Ισραήλ, εκκένωση Τεχεράνης, Ιράν, Ιρανοί, Τελ Αβίβ, Ντόναλντ Τραμπ, αμερικανικά στρατεύματα, κύμα δεξαμενόπλοιων της USAF αναχωρούν από την Αμερική εν μέσω κλιμάκωσης της σύγκρουσης Ισραήλ-Ιράν, στρατιωτικά αεροσκάφη μεταφοράς εμπορευμάτων αναχωρούν από το Άνιστον, Al Depot, Μπαράκ Ομπάμα, στρατός των ΗΠΑ, στρατός των ΗΠΑ, αμερικανικά στρατεύματα, Αμερικανοί στρατιώτες, Turkey, Turkiye, ΚΟΣΜΟΣ
Επίθεση στο Ιράν , Επίθεση ΗΠΑ στο Ιράν , ΗΠΑ , Σαουδική Αραβία , Drones, WORLD,
Attack on Iran, US attack on Iran, USA, Saudi Arabia, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Attack, USA
Donald Trump, Friedrich Merz, White House
Ισραήλ, πόλεμος Ισραήλ-Χαμάς, Πόλεμος, πόλεμος στο Ισραήλ, Παλαιστίνη, Παλαιστίνιοι, Νέα, παγκόσμια νέα, Αλ-Άκσα, Τζαμί, Μουσουλμάνοι, Χαμάς, Ισραηλινοί, Εβραίοι, Σιωνιστές, Ισραηλινοί έποικοι, Λίβανος, Ιράν, Γάζα, Λωρίδα της Γάζας, Ελλάδα, ελληνικά νέα, Τουρκία, Ερντογάν,
Ιράν, πόλεμος κατά του Ιράν, Ισραήλ, ΗΠΑ, Μοσάντ, Υεμένη, Ιράκ, Ρωσία, πόλεμος, Ευρώπη, αρχεία Epstein, Τζέφρι Epstein, Τραμπ, Ντόναλντ Τραμπ, με πυραύλους μικρού βεληνεκούς, Αλί Χαμενεΐ
Ανώτατος Ηγέτης του Ιράν, Αλί Χοσεϊνί Χαμενεΐ, Αγιατολάχ Αλί Χαμενεΐ, ΚΟΣΜΟΣ
Ισραήλ, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia,, Ιράν, ΗΠΑ, Πόλεμος, Επίθεση στο Ιράν, Ρωσία, Πούτιν, Ρωσική κυβέρνηση, Επίθεση στο Ιράν. Ισραήλ, Πόλεμος
Iran, NBC News, Attack on Iran, War, USA, Donald Trump, Drones, WORLD, Iran,, Islamophobia , NAVY , Mojtaba Khamenei, GREECE, Dubai, C-130, Ambassador, Eleusis, United Arab Emirates
Iran Conflict, Akrotiri Cyprus , Bahrain, explosion in Cyprus, Gulf conflict, Iran-Israel war, RAF Akrotiri, Iranian retaliation, Israel, March 2026, escalation in the Middle East, missile warnings, Qatar, RAF Akrotiri, Shahed drone, UAE, attack by US allies, Trump, Donald Trump, Iran, Israel, White House, Iran-Israel conflict, Tehran evacuation, Iran, Iranians, Tel Aviv, Donald Trump, US troops, USAF tanker wave departs America amid escalation of Israel-Iran conflict, military cargo planes depart Anniston, Al Depot, Barack Obama, US military, US military, US troops, US soldiers, Turkey, Turkiye, WORLD
Attack on Iran, US attack on Iran, USA, Saudi Arabia, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Attack, USA
Donald Trump, Friedrich Merz, White House
Israel, Israel-Hamas war, War, war in Israel, Palestine, Palestinians, News, world news, Al-Aqsa, Mosque, Muslims, Hamas, Israelis, Jews, Zionists, Israeli settlers, Lebanon, Iran, Gaza, Gaza Strip, Greece, Greek news, Turkey, Erdogan,
Iran, war on Iran, Israel, USA, Mossad, Yemen, Iraq, Russia, war, Europe, Epstein files, Jeffrey Epstein, Trump, Donald Trump, with short-range missiles, Ali Khamenei, Supreme Leader of Iran, Ali Hosseini Khamenei, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, WORLD
Israel, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia,, Iran, USA, War, Attack on Iran, Russia, Putin, Russian government
WORLD, Iran, USA, Tehran